Development Trends of Cultural and Creative Industries in Ukraine in the First Quarter of the 21th Century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to analyse the main trends in the development of cultural and creative industries in Ukraine in the first quarter of the 21st century. It examines the influence of cultural, social, and economic changes on the formation and transformation of cultural and creative industries, including artistic projects, national brands, and cultural initiatives. The research methodology is based on general scientific principles of systematisation and generalisation, which enabled the author to identify and scientific prove the key trends of the development of cultural and creative industries in Ukraine. The implementation of the systematic approach provided an analysis of cultural and creative industries as a complex and dynamic system that interacts with socio-cultural and economic processes. The comparative method allowed for the analyse of the development of cultural and creative industries in European countries and the identify their specificity in Ukraine. The analytical method facilitated the identification of conceptual foundations and characteristics of cultural and creative industries as a tool for cultural transformation. The historical approach ensured an understanding of the evolution of cultural and creative industries in the context of global trends and transformations of the Ukrainian cultural space. Using the descriptive method, the current state of the development of cultural and creative industries, their impact on Ukraine's artistic environment, and the international cultural brand of the country were analysed. The scientific novelty of the article lies in conducting a cultural analysis of the main trends in the development of cultural and creative industries in Ukraine in the first quarter of the 21st century, particularly through studying their interaction with European and global practices. For the first time, conceptual approaches to the formation of Ukraine's cultural brand based on artistic projects in the context of globalisation challenges and contemporary cultural transformations are examined. Conclusions: The development of cultural and creative industries in Ukraine in the first quarter of the 21st century occurs amidst dynamic changes in the socio-cultural environment, driven by globalisation, digitalisation, and the activation of artistic initiatives. An analysis of international experience confirms that cultural and creative industries play a key role in shaping the national cultural brand and enhancing Ukraine's international competitiveness. It has been established that artistic projects are an effective tool for developing cultural and creative industries, contributing to creative self-expression, creating new opportunities for artists, and strengthening cultural ties at both national and international levels. Integrating global practices and adapting them to Ukrainian realities opens up prospects for the further development of cultural and creative industries as an important element of the country's cultural transformation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".