Using diffusion models for reducing spatiotemporal errors of deep learning based urban microclimate predictions at post-processing stage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a powerful tool for modeling turbulent flow and is commonly used for urban microclimate simulations. However, traditional CFD methods are computationally intensive, requiring substantial hardware resources for high-fidelity simulations. Deep learning (DL) models are becoming popular as efficient alternatives, requiring less computational resources to model complex non-linear interactions in fluid flow simulations. A major drawback of DL models is that they are prone to error accumulation in long-term temporal predictions, often compromising their accuracy and reliability. To address this shortcoming, this study investigates the use of a denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM) as a novel post-processing technique to mitigate error propagation in DL models' sequential predictions. To address this, we employ convolutional autoencoder (CAE) and U-Net architectures to predict airflow dynamics around a cubic structure. The DDPM is then applied to the model's predictions, refining the reconstructed flow fields to better align with high-fidelity statistical results from large-eddy simulations. Results demonstrate that, although deep learning models provide significant computational advantages over traditional numerical solvers, they are susceptible to error accumulation in sequential predictions; however, utilizing DDPM as a post-processing step enhances the accuracy of DL models by up to 65% while maintaining a three times speedup compared to traditional numerical solvers. These findings highlight the potential of integrating denoising diffusion probabilistic models as a transformative approach to improving the reliability and accuracy of deep learning-based urban microclimate simulations, paving the way for more efficient and scalable fluid dynamics modeling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".