MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408531152 · doi:10.1016/j.gimo.2025.103374

P507: Tetrasomy 9p in a patient affected with dilated cardiomyopathy: Incidental finding or extended phenotype?

2025· article· en· W4408531152 on OpenAlexaff
Tania Cruz Mariño, Josianne Leblanc, Jessica Tardif, Marie‐Jacqueline Thomas, Annabelle Pratte, Jonathan Beaudoin, Melinda Barabas

Bibliographic record

VenueGenetics in Medicine Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac tumors and thrombi
Canadian institutionsCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-JeanMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDilated cardiomyopathyPhenotypeTetrasomyMedicineGeneticsInternal medicineBiologyCytogeneticsChromosomeHeart failureGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Outcome and Follow-Up: Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation evaluated the patient at 10 months old and reported overall improvement in his developmental milestones.He continued to gain weight appropriately and his anemia improved.He is scheduled to follow-up in genetics clinic for reassessment in 2 years and will be followed by neurology for seizure monitoring.With his early interventions in place, he will continue to receive the necessary support throughout childhood and as he enters school.Discussion: While all the patient's symptoms coincide with GAND, other neurodevelopmental disorders have similar presentations.Some of his symptoms, such as benign subarachnoid space enlargement, reflux, and laryngomalacia can be written off as "common pediatric findings" or that it will improve over time.It is uncertain the extent of his delays and how they compare to other GAND patients as he was diagnosed quite early.His language development and ambulation, while delayed, cannot accurately be compared to the other, older patients.Moreover, his variant has not yet been reported in the literature and whether his course will continue along the same pattern is unknown.Conclusion: It is well known that gene expression can be modified by the environment and the brain shows greater plasticity in early development.Therefore, early diagnosis and intervention can provide a pathway for these children to reach their greatest potential.The awareness and persistence of his mother allowed the patient to be seen by the necessary specialists and receive appropriate interventions in a timely manner.Introduction: GATAD2B associated neurodevelopmental disorder (GAND) is a rare condition present in about 400 individuals.Despite some symptoms presenting quite early, the average age of diagnosis is 6.8 years of age.Case Presentation: An 8-month-old boy presented to genetics clinic with concerns for mild, global developmental delay, macrocephaly, hypotonia and laryngomalacia.He was born full-term and had an uncomplicated delivery without NICU stay.At birth, the head circumference was 99th percentile and at 4 months, it remained in this range.He had trouble feeding with reflux, noisy feeding and chronic nasal congestion.His mother noticed he appeared more fatigued often.His eyes would cross at times.He did not appear to be holding his head up well or rolling over and he was vocalizing, but without consonants.His 2.5-year-old brother did not experience any delays in his development and there was no family history of intellectual disability, developmental delays or autism.Diagnostic Workup: MRI imaging demonstrated benign enlargement of subarachnoid spaces.He was diagnosed with laryngomalacia on flexible laryngoscopy and video fluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) was consistent with oropharyngeal dysphagia.Esophagogastroduodenoscopy pathology noted reflux esophagitis.Additionally, ophthalmology reported sectional iris pigmentation, over-riding of the orbicularis muscle, and high hyperopic astigmatism, and his audiology assessment revealed middle ear dysfunction.Microarray ordered at 8 months of age identified a duplication on the long arm of chromosome 6 of uncertain significance involving genes AGPAT4 and PRKN.Fragile X screening was normal.Exome sequencing was significant for a novel, de novo heterozygous deletion G275Vfs*18 in GATAD2B consistent with a diagnosis of GAND.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenetics in Medicine OpenSame topicCardiac tumors and thrombiFrench-language works237,207