An Enhanced Empirical Mode Decomposition Technique for Rotor Fault Detection in Induction Motors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Induction motors or machines (IMs) are the driving force in various industries such as manufacturing, transportation, and wind power generation. Hence it is essential to detect faults in IMs reliably so as to enhance the production quality and avoid operational degradation. However, it is still challenging to detect faults in IMs reliably as fault feature properties could change under variable IM operating conditions. The objective of this article is to propose an enhanced empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) technique to detect the IM broken rotor bar (BRB) fault based on motor current signature analysis (MCSA). In the proposed EEMD technique, first, a phase-insensitive similarity function is suggested to determine the representative intrinsic mode function (IMF). Second, an optimized adaptive multiband filter (OAMF) is proposed to recognize the fault characteristic features from the spectrum. Third, a modified whale optimization (MWO) algorithm is suggested to optimize the parameters in the adaptive multiband filter. A reference function is also proposed to enhance feature properties and IM fault detection. The effectiveness of the proposed EEMD technique is verified experimentally under different IM conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".