MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408543281 · doi:10.1080/17512433.2025.2481868

Scoping review of the availability and uptake of disease modifying therapies in children and adolescents with multiple sclerosis

2025· article· en· W4408543281 on OpenAlexaff
Lauren Strasser, Joley Johnstone, Jessie Cunningham, Helen Tremlett, E. Ann Yeh

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Clinical Pharmacology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaWestern UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMultiple sclerosisDiseaseFingolimodIntensive care medicineImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 10% of individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) have pediatric-onset (<18-years-old). Pediatric-specific barriers to accessing disease modifying therapies (DMT) exist. Issues include few pediatric-based randomized controlled trials (RCT), often required for formal regulatory approval, and resultant challenges with cost/coverage. This review assessed real-world DMT uptake in pediatric-MS to better understand potential barriers. AREAS COVERED: = 14,833). Most studies were from Europe (53.4%), North America (22.7%), or the Middle East (10%). Regional variabilities were found in DMT uptake between continents. Only 13 (14.8%) studies included information on DMT funding source. EXPERT OPINION: Pediatric-MS patients showed low DMT uptake with variability in DMT use based on region. Limited data was found regarding specific barriers to DMT access. Further research is needed to better understand regional barriers to access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.205
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.469
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of Clinical PharmacologySame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207