Does outdoor advertising correlate with retail food purchases made by adolescents? A cross-sectional study in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Food marketing plays a substantial role in shaping adolescent diets, having wide-ranging ramifications for health behaviours and outcomes throughout the life course. Yet, there remains a dearth of research about how outdoor advertising as a specific channel of food marketing affects purchasing behaviours. We examine self-reported purchases made at retail food outlets by adolescents as it relates to the availability of outdoor food and beverage advertising around each participant's home, school, and along the journey to and from school. We also consider the impacts of sociodemographics and consumption attitudes on purchasing, as compared to the geographic availability of outdoor advertising. Data are drawn from a survey completed by 545 adolescents in 2018 across four secondary schools in the Middlesex-London region of Ontario, Canada. The availability of outdoor advertising in the home and school environment is marginally correlated with self-reported purchases made at fast food, table-based, grocery, and variety retail outlets. However, consumption attitudes, cultural background, and gender are significantly correlated with purchases, with substantially larger effect sizes. The overall results were consistent between estimating the availability of outdoor advertising in the immediate area surrounding the home and along the journey to and from school. There is considerable health promotion policy interest in regulating outdoor advertising around child-serving locations. However, scarce health promotion resources would be better allocated to educational programming that addresses the substantial role of consumption attitudes in affecting adolescent purchasing behaviour, as compared to the considerably weaker impact of outdoor food advertising observed in our analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".