MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408550143 · doi:10.3390/muscles4010009

The Muscle Cells in Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions: Systematic Review

2025· review· en· W4408550143 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ana Margarida Vieira, Maria Leonor Faleiro, Teresa Mascarenhas, Sandra Pais

Bibliographic record

VenueMuscles · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPelvic floor disorders treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPelvic Floor MusclePelvic floorPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicineAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The pelvic floor muscles are important structures involved in pelvic floor tone, pelvic organ support, and continence. The aim of this study was to perform an update on the pelvic floor muscle structure and function alterations of women with pelvic floor dysfunctions. METHODS: A systematic search was undertaken in two electronic databases, PubMed/Medline and Ovid Discovery to find manuscripts (in English), published between 1 January 2002 and 31 July 2022, including all clinical studies using the following search terms: "muscle" or "extracellular matrix *" and "pelvic floor dysfunction *". All clinical trials, observational, or animal studies examining the muscle and reporting pelvic floor dysfunction as a primary outcome were included. Case reports, literature reviews, conference papers and theses, and unpublished data were excluded. To ensure that no eligible articles were overlooked, the reference lists of all included papers underwent manual scrutiny. The bias level was estimated using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort and case-control studies. A qualitative synthesis was performed. RESULTS: The significant qualitative and quantitative heterogeneity between the studies did not allow for a quantitative analysis. Of the 30 articles selected with a total of 5592 women, 15 referred to the analysis of structural muscle defects, which included 3365 participants with urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, fecal incontinence, cistocele, rectocele, and sexual dysfunction; 10 manuscripts referred to the study of pelvic floor muscle function with a population of 2042 women, such as urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, fecal incontinence, and sexual dysfunction; and 5 papers evaluated cellular and/or molecular changes affecting the pelvic floor muscles, like urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and rectocele, which included a total of 185 participants. Women with pelvic floor muscle defects are at greater risk of pelvic floor dysfunctions, and inversely, women with pelvic floor dysfunctions have more pelvic floor muscle defects than women without pelvic floor dysfunctions. These patients demonstrate a reduction in muscle tone, contraction strength, and resistance, a compromised neuromuscular activity, and an alteration of the normal composition and organization of the muscle cells. CONCLUSIONS: Women with pelvic floor dysfunction have anatomical muscle defects, disturbance of muscle function and cellular changes involving muscle cells and nerve fibers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.005
Bibliometrics0.0120.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMusclesSame topicPelvic floor disorders treatmentsFrench-language works237,207