MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408558258 · doi:10.1038/s41535-025-00746-7

Light-induced charge and spin Hall currents in materials with C4K symmetry

2025· article· en· W4408558258 on OpenAlexaff
T. Farajollahpour, R. Ganesh, K. V. Samokhin

Bibliographic record

Venuenpj Quantum Materials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTopological Materials and Phenomena
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsCharge (physics)Symmetry (geometry)Spin (aerodynamics)Spin Hall effectPhysicsHall effectMaterials scienceQuantum mechanicsElectronSpin polarizationMagnetic fieldMathematicsGeometryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Berry curvature can manifest itself in current responses. It has recently been shown that a Berry-curvature quadrupole induces a third-order ac Hall response in systems that break time reversal (K) and a fourfold rotational (C 4) symmetries, while remaining invariant under their combination (C 4 K). In this work, we demonstrate that incident light can induce a dc Hall current in such systems. We consider a combination of static and light-induced electric fields. We calculate the current perpendicular to both the static field and the fourfold axis. Remarkably, the induced current is generically spin-polarized. A net charge current appears for light that is linearly or elliptically polarized, but not for circular polarization. In contrast, the spin current remains unchanged when the polarization is varied. This allows for rich possibilities such as generating a pure spin current using circularly polarized light. We demonstrate this physics using a two-dimensional toy model with C 4 K symmetry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuenpj Quantum MaterialsSame topicTopological Materials and PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207