MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408560767 · doi:10.1162/imag_a_00525

Alignment of auditory artificial networks with massive individual fMRI brain data leads to generalisable improvements in brain encoding and downstream tasks

2025· article· en· W4408560767 on OpenAlex
Maëlle Freteault, Maximilien Le Clei, Loïc Tetrel, Pierre Bellec, Nicolas Farrugia

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueImaging Neuroscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Music Perception
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCourtois FoundationRégion Bretagne
KeywordsComputer scienceEncoding (memory)Brain activity and meditationBenchmark (surveying)Functional magnetic resonance imagingArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkPsychologyNeuroscienceElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Artificial neural networks trained in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) have emerged as key tools to model brain processes, sparking the idea of aligning network representations with brain dynamics to enhance performance on AI tasks. While this concept has gained support in the visual domain, we investigate here the feasibility of creating auditory artificial neural models directly aligned with individual brain activity. This objective raises major computational challenges, as models have to be trained directly with brain data, which is typically collected at a much smaller scale than data used to train AI models. We aimed to answer two key questions: (1) Can brain alignment of auditory models lead to improved brain encoding for novel, previously unseen stimuli? (2) Can brain alignment lead to generalisable representations of auditory signals that are useful for solving a variety of complex auditory tasks? To answer these questions, we relied on two massive datasets: a deep phenotyping dataset from the Courtois neuronal modelling project, where six subjects watched four seasons (36 h) of the Friends TV series in functional magnetic resonance imaging and the HEAR benchmark, a large battery of downstream auditory tasks. We fine-tuned SoundNet, a small pretrained convolutional neural network with ~2.5 M parameters. Aligning SoundNet with brain data from three seasons of Friends led to substantial improvement in brain encoding in the fourth season, extending beyond auditory and visual cortices. We also observed consistent performance gains on the HEAR benchmark, particularly for tasks with limited training data, where brain-aligned models performed comparably with the best-performing models regardless of size. We finally compared individual and group models, finding that individual models often matched or outperformed group models in both brain encoding and downstream task performance, highlighting the data efficiency of fine-tuning with individual brain data. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of aligning artificial neural network representations with individual brain activity during auditory processing, and suggest that this alignment is particularly beneficial for tasks with limited training data. Future research is needed to establish whether larger models can achieve even better performance and whether the observed gains extend to other tasks, particularly in the context of few-shot learning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.278
Threshold uncertainty score0.935

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it