MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408564021 · doi:10.1109/tase.2025.3552446

Personalized Assistance in Robotic Rehabilitation: Real-Time Adaptation via Energy-Based Performance Monitoring

2025· article· en· W4408564021 on OpenAlex
Leilaalsadat Pezeshki, Hamid Sadeghian, Abolfazl Mohebbi, Mehdi Keshmiri, Sami Haddadin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersLongLeif GaPa
KeywordsAdaptation (eye)Computer scienceRehabilitationRobotEnergy (signal processing)Real-time computingEmbedded systemEngineeringSimulationControl engineeringArtificial intelligencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent studies underscore the importance of the patient’s active contribution and voluntary effort in enhancing therapy outcomes in physical rehabilitation. This paper presents an adaptive control scheme to implement active robotic rehabilitation. The primary goal is to dynamically regulate robotic assistance based on the patient’s performance and individual conditions, encouraging active participation, and effective therapy. To achieve this, a Lyapunov-based adaptive algorithm is developed that dynamically adjusts the admittance parameters by balancing the error and effort minimization. A novel performance index based on human energy input enables real-time identification of the intended human sharing role. This index is used as an adaptive rate in the proposed algorithm to enhance the control system’s dynamic responsiveness to changes in human performance. The proposed approach achieves two main rehabilitation objectives. First, it encourages active and safe human participation. Second, it enhances the therapy by providing personalized assistance, tailored to individual abilities and conditions, and thus reduces the need for therapist intervention. The performance of the proposed approach is illustrated in experimental studies. The results demonstrate the adaptability of the algorithm, ensuring compliant and safe interaction and effective task completion. Note to Practitioners—In a human-robot cooperation (HRC) framework, the automatic adaptation of the robot’s role as well as safe and stable interaction are crucial. These aspects are amplified in the context of robotic rehabilitation due to the special conditions of the human participants. Classic control methods, in shared control, lack system intelligence and automation in role allocation. However, the shared role of humans in HRC, particularly in rehabilitation applications, introduces real-time and unpredictable variations. This study addresses the shortcomings of classic control methods, by integrating intelligence into the control system through an adaptive Neural Network algorithm in shared autonomy. To emulate human-like adaptability, two crucial aspects are considered. Firstly, it incorporates safety assurance embedded in the adaptive algorithm via Lyapunov-based adaptation. Secondly, it detects the human’s role within the control loop through a novel energy-based performance index, which views the human as an active contributor to the system’s dynamic energy flow. This ensures robust behavior by dynamically adjusting the trade-off between task completion and minimal robot intervention. A standout feature of our algorithm lies in its expendability to exoskeleton systems, making it highly versatile for use in robotic rehabilitation and assistive technologies. The algorithm’s design allows for straightforward integration with exoskeletons, requiring only interaction force measurements in the joint space. It facilitates monitoring of a patient’s performance in each joint using the proposed performance index based on the human energy entry into the system. Beyond rehabilitation, the algorithm’s ability to adjust autonomy levels through adaptation makes it applicable to a wide range of Human-Robot Cooperation scenarios where automatic role allocation is necessary. Preliminary experiments underscore the adaptive algorithm’s robust responsiveness to changes in human performance. Future investigations should involve clinical experiments addressing real-life challenges associated with various movement deficiencies and responding to real-time issues that may arise during rehabilitation sessions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.395
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it