MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408564100 · doi:10.1109/tetci.2025.3547851

Latent Object Embedding for Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimation

2025· article· en· W4408564100 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMonocularArtificial intelligenceEmbeddingObject (grammar)Computer visionComputer scienceEstimationPattern recognition (psychology)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extracting 3D information from 2D images is highly significant, and self-supervised monocular depth estimation has demonstrated great potential in this field. However, existing methods primarily focus on estimating depth from immediate visual features, leading to severe foreground-background adhesion, which poses challenges for achieving precise depth estimation. In this paper, we propose a depth estimation method called LOEDepth, which can implicitly distinguish foreground objects from the background. In LOEDepth, a latent object embedding module is introduced, which leverages a set of learnable queries to generate latent object proposals from both immediate visual features extracted by the encoder and sparse object features derived through multi-scale deformable attention. These latent object proposals are utilized to perform soft classification on the decoded features to distinguish foreground objects from the background. Additionally, as depth boundaries do not always align with semantic boundaries, we propose a novel deep decoder to provide decoding features with rich spatial location retrieval and semantic information. Finally, two mask strategies are utilized to conceal pixels violating the scene's static assumption, so as to mitigate disruptions caused by abnormal pixels during self-supervised training. Experimental results on the KITTI and Make3D datasets demonstrate significant performance improvements and robust fine-grained scene depth estimation capabilities of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.431
Threshold uncertainty score0.734

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it