MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408564239 · doi:10.1016/j.xjidi.2025.100363

Cutaneous and Gut Dysbiosis in Alopecia Areata: A Review

2025· review· en· W4408564239 on OpenAlexaff
Nicole E. Burma, Michele Ramien

Bibliographic record

VenueJID Innovations · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHair Growth and Disorders
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlopecia areataDermatologyDysbiosisMedicineGut floraImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alopecia areata (AA) is a common, immune-mediated nonscarring alopecia. Breakdown of immune privilege combined with local immune cell infiltration is central to the development of AA; yet, the instigating factors causing immune dysregulation remain elusive. Recent attention has focused on the microbiome in AA, where alterations to the usual composition of healthy microorganisms is observed. This review examines the current evidence for bacterial dysbiosis affecting the scalp and gut of patients with AA and summarizes the potential influence of altered microbial composition on immune dysregulation in AA. Although the literature supports changes to the bacterial composition of patients with AA, a causal link between microbial dysbiosis and AA pathogenesis remains to be established.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.955

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJID InnovationsSame topicHair Growth and DisordersFrench-language works237,207