Numerical simulation study of the sensitivity of solar cell current output to environmental changes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study constructs a solar cell simulation model and tracks the maximum power output from the solar cell using the MPPT algorithm. Simulation simulation experiments are conducted to analyze the effects of changes in environmental factors such as season, weather, light, temperature, wind speed, etc. on the current and power output of solar cells. The total output power and the peak output power of the solar cell are the largest in summer, which are 7407.69kW and 114.93kW, respectively, and the total output power and the peak output power of the solar cell are the smallest in fall, which are 1748.96kW and 31.58kW, respectively. The peak power output of the solar cell is the largest in sunny days, which is 107.56kW, and the smallest in rainy days, which is 37.06kW. The total solar cell power output is maximum (7896.93kW) on clear to cloudy days and minimum (1955.27kW) on rainy days. The solar cell output current and maximum power values decreased with decreasing light intensity. The ambient temperature has little effect on the short circuit current, the output current increases slightly with increasing temperature, the open circuit voltage decreases drastically with increasing temperature and the maximum output power decreases with increasing temperature. The maximum output power of the solar cell increases with increasing wind speed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".