MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408569450 · doi:10.1186/s12939-025-02426-1

Breaking the cycle: how Spain’s dependency care system creates occupational inequalities in geriatric nursing assistants and the need for reform

2025· article· en· W4408569450 on OpenAlexaff
Mireia Campoy-Vila, Albert Espelt, Júlia Jubany, Olga Borao, A. Canet-Torres, Carles Muntaner

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Equity in Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Canadian institutionsCanada Research ChairsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial policyDependency (UML)Health care reformHealth services researchInequalityNursingPublic healthHealth policyMedicineGerontologyEnvironmental healthPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The implementation of Spain's Dependency Law aimed to enhance care for those with dependency needs. However, its focus on privatized service provision has raised concerns about potential inequalities in working conditions for geriatric nursing assistants working in long-term care, particularly regarding resources, workload, and labour protections between public and private ownership. This study aims to explore the employment conditions, working conditions and health status of geriatric nursing assistants in Spanish nursing homes, specifically examining the potential impact of facility ownership type. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study including geriatric nursing assistants working in nursing homes in Spain in the year 2022. The final sample consisted of 344 nursing assistants recruited using the snowball and self-selection sampling methods. Data were collected using a computerized, self-administered questionnaire. The variables studied encompassed employment and working conditions and health-related factors, including physical and mental health status assessed using 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12v1), physical activity levels, and characteristics of back pain. To examine the association between the descriptive variables and facility ownership, Poisson regression models with robust variance were fitted. RESULTS: Nursing assistants in private nursing homes were significantly more likely to report worse working and health-related conditions (aPR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.07-1.32) compared to those in public facilities. For example, only 22.6% of public workers felt they lacked time for tasks, compared to 48.2% in private nursing homes. Similarly, emotional exhaustion was more prevalent among private staff (86.6% vs. 71.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the negative impact of neoliberal policies, particularly the privatization of nursing homes, on the working conditions of geriatric nursing assistants, exacerbating health inequalities. A shift towards a community-based care model with increased public investment is essential to improve working conditions, promote healthy aging, and enhance the quality of care provided by nursing assistants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.499
Teacher spread0.407 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Equity in HealthSame topicGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesFrench-language works237,207