MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408569845 · doi:10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100484

Fear Synchrony of Mouse Dyads: Interaction of Sex Composition and Stress

2025· article· en· W4408569845 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Wataru Ito, Andrew Holmes, Alexei Morozov

Bibliographic record

VenueBiological Psychiatry Global Open Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAction Observation and Synchronization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institutes of HealthStrategic Innovation Fund
KeywordsPsychologyComposition (language)Stress (linguistics)Developmental psychologySocial psychologyLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Socially coordinated threat responses support a group’s survival. Given the distinct social roles of each sex, social coordination can differ between males and females and mixed-sex groups. We investigated how the sex composition of mouse dyads affected one form of social coordination, the synchronization of conditioned freezing, and assessed how emotional state and social context influenced synchronization by exposure to stress and altering the partner’s familiarity, respectively. Mice were fear conditioned individually to an auditory stimulus and tested in same- or opposite-sex dyads with familiar or unfamiliar partners. Independent cohorts were tested after 5 minutes of restraint stress or with prefrontal inactivation by muscimol. Time-series data on freezing bouts were used to compute the synchrony index, freezing properties, and state transitions based on a Markov model. In same-sex dyads, males exhibited higher synchrony than females. State transition analysis revealed sex-specific synchronization strategies: Males maintained a congruent freezing state primarily by following their partners’ state transitions, whereas females did so by reversing their own. Stress disrupted synchrony in males, which was prevented by prefrontal inactivation, while stress enhanced synchrony in females. Partner’s unfamiliarity reduced synchrony in males but had no effect on females. Conversely, opposite-sex dyads exhibited high levels of synchrony and a unique resilience to stress and unfamiliarity without preferred synchronization strategies. Mice display sex composition–specific synchronization of threat response and its modulation by stress and social context, providing insights into neuropsychiatric disorders characterized by abnormal threat responses in social contexts with same- and opposite-sex groups. Many social organisms, including humans, synchronize emotional responses to threats. A behavioral paradigm, which captures fear synchronization in mouse dyads, revealed that sex composition of the dyad determines how the 2 animals synchronize. In same-sex dyads, males synchronized more than females and followed their partner behavioral transitions whereas females reversed their own behaviors. Stress and partner unfamiliarity lowered male synchronization, but stress increased synchronization in females. Opposite-sex dyads synchronized strongly regardless of stress or familiarity and showed no specific strategy. These findings demonstrate that sex determines fear synchronization depending on the emotional and social context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiological Psychiatry Global Open ScienceSame topicAction Observation and SynchronizationFrench-language works237,207