MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408572242 · doi:10.3389/fneur.2025.1506819

Prognostic value of elevated cardiac troponin in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4408572242 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jiahui Zhao, Shujuan Gu, Xudong Zhao, Shisong Wang, Qichen Pan, Cunyi Zou

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neurology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTakotsubo Cardiomyopathy and Associated Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubarachnoid hemorrhageMeta-analysisMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineTroponinMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a common intracranial hemorrhagic condition associated with a high mortality rate and significant disability due to serious complications. In clinical practice, we have observed that elevated serum cardiac troponin (cTn) levels correlate with a poor prognosis in SAH. Although some studies have reported this correlation, these studies had small sample sizes and did not make a distinction between traumatic SAH and aneurysmal SAH. Accordingly, we aimed to systematically analyze the prognostic evaluation value of elevated cTn levels in SAH by reviewing all existing studies to provide a clinical reference. Methods: We selected studies on cTn and SAH from PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trails databases published before December 2023. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines were followed to assess the methodological quality of the systematic review. We divided the included studies into two groups: aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) group and total subarachnoid hemorrhage (toSAH) group. The total subarachnoid hemorrhage (toSAH) group included aSAH and traumatic SAH studies for analysis. The pooled effect size was calculated using R studio and Stata 14.0. Results: In the toSAH group, 1,559 out of 6,349 (24.55%) SAH patients from 33 studies exhibited elevated cTn levels, while 25.0% in the aSAH group also exhibited similar results. In the aSAH group, high levels of cTn were significantly related to increased mortality both in the hospital [OR = 2.51, 95%CI (1.95, 3.23)] and 3 months later [OR = 2.27, 95%CI (1.47, 3.49)]. An increased incidence of disturbance of consciousness [OR = 2.28, 95%CI (1.41, 3.67)], delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) [OR = 1.99, 95%CI (1.40, 2.83)], physical disability [OR = 2.39, 95%CI (1.79, 3.20)], cardiac dysfunction [OR = 3.97, 95%CI (2.95, 5.33)], arrhythmias [OR = 4.87, 95%CI (2.52, 9.41)], abnormal ventricular wall motion [OR = 8.20, 95%CI (3.70, 18.18)], and neurogenic pulmonary edema [OR = 2.76, 95%CI (1.85, 4.12)] were associated with elevated cTn levels. In the total SAH patient group, the results were further validated. Conclusion: Elevated cTn levels were associated with a poor prognosis and an increased risk of adverse events, particularly in aneurysmal SAH. Clinicians should prioritize monitoring SAH patients with elevated cTn levels and consider early intervention strategies. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023433744, identifier: CRD42023433744.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0210.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeurologySame topicTakotsubo Cardiomyopathy and Associated PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207