MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408573312 · doi:10.1042/bcj20240543

Trypanosomatid histones: the building blocks of the epigenetic code of highly divergent eukaryotes

2025· review· en· W4408573312 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Josefina Ocampo, Santiago Carena, M. Lopez, Romina Trinidad Zambrano Siri, S. Balestra, G. Alonso

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemical Journal · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrypanosoma species research and implications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaAgencia Nacional de Promoción de la Investigación, el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la InnovaciónUniversidad de Buenos AiresConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsHistone codeHistoneChromatinNucleosomeBiologyHistone-modifying enzymesGeneticsHistone methylationHistone H1EpigenomicsHistone H2AHistone octamerComputational biologyCell biologyDNAGeneDNA methylationGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Histones play a fundamental role in eukaryotic organisms not only as scaffolding proteins in DNA packaging but also in regulating gene expression. They constitute the protein reel around which DNA wraps forming nucleosomes. This initial packing gives rise to the chromatin fiber which is next folded into three-dimensional arrangements. Additionally, histones have expanded their functions through the emergence of histone variants which have specialized purposes and can deeply affect chromatin organization and dynamics. Moreover, both canonical histones and histone variants comprise the building blocks of the histone code by being targets of different post-translational modifications (PTMs) that occur in a highly regulated manner both in place and time. Most of the above-mentioned about chromatin organization is conserved among eukaryotes. However, trypanosomatid histones have many peculiarities that entail a special description. In this review, we compile the current knowledge of canonical core histones, histone variants, and their PTMs in trypanosomatids. We highlight the similarities and differences between histone variants and their canonical counterparts in trypanosomatids, and we compare them with those from model organisms. Finally, we discuss the crosstalk between different histone marks and their genomic distribution underlying the uniqueness of trypanosomatids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemical JournalSame topicTrypanosoma species research and implicationsFrench-language works237,207