MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408578876 · doi:10.36472/msd.v12i3.1270

Bibliometrics And Visualisation Analysis Of Literature On Intrauterin Insemination In Obstetrics Gynecology Research Area (2013-2023)

2025· article· en· W4408578876 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Süleyman Akarsu, Şenol Kalyoncu, Çoşkun ŞİMŞİR, Ahmet Kurt

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Science and Discovery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBibliometricsObstetrics and gynaecologyGynecologyObstetricsLibrary sciencePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is a non-invasive, cost-effective assisted reproductive technique widely recognized as the primary intervention and first-line treatment for unexplained infertility. However, no comprehensive bibliometric studies have been conducted to analyze the latest findings and developments in this field. This study aims to evaluate the scientific literature on IUI. Materials and Methods: This bibliometric study utilized the Web of Science database to identify articles related to IUI. All search results were exported and cited in plain text formats to create source files for analysis. The data were then examined using Biblioshiny (version 2.0) and VOSviewer software. The analysis covered annual publication trends, authorship distribution by country and academic institution, journal distribution, author productivity, and keyword usage. Results: As of October 1, 2023, the Web of Science SCIE database contained 24,835 publications, with 18,425 published since 2000 and 9,750 since 2013. After filtering, 964 articles from 55 different sources were analyzed. The dataset, spanning 2013 to 2023, had a mean document age of 5.21 years and an average of 14.95 citations per document, with an annual growth rate of 5.27%. The United States, the Netherlands, and China were the top three contributing countries. Leading academic affiliations included the University of Amsterdam, Harvard University, and McGill University. "Fertility and Sterility" and "Human Reproduction" were the most frequently cited journals. Keyword analysis identified key terms in IUI research, highlighting emerging trends and research priorities. Conclusions: This study provides an overview of the current state and trends in IUI research. The findings offer valuable insights into collaboration patterns, research hotspots, and emerging frontiers, which may benefit researchers and clinicians in the field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.2210.209
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Science and DiscoverySame topicAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyFrench-language works237,207