MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408584528 · doi:10.1214/24-aoas1914

Leveraging cellphone-derived mobility networks to assess Covid-19 travel risk

2025· article· en· W4408584528 on OpenAlexaff
Justin Slater, Jeffrey S. Rosenthal, Jorge Mateu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Annals of Applied Statistics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Computer science2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)GeographyData scienceEconometricsMathematicsMedicineVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, public health authorities across the globe have implemented policies, such as lockdowns, in an attempt to reduce population mobility and, consequently, person-to-person contacts. It is well known that lockdowns reduce mobility, but to what extent does this reduction in mobility lead to lower infection rates? In this paper we extend the endemic-epidemic modeling framework in a principled manner, incorporating temporally changing mobility network data and quantifying the risk associated with travelling throughout the first year of the pandemic in two Spanish communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Annals of Applied StatisticsSame topicHuman Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisFrench-language works237,207