Determination of subclinical atherosclerosis by total plaque area in patients with diabetes and hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: the determination of the carotid total plaque area (TPA) is an indicator of subclinical atherosclerosis and a useful tool in early cardiovascular prevention. Classically, diabetes has been considered the most atherogenic disease, even more so than hypertension, but the incidence of stroke and heart attack is higher in patients with hypertension than in patients with diabetes alone. Therefore, in this study, we compared hypertension and diabetes with regard to the burden of atherosclerosis. METHODS: a cross-sectional observational study was carried out on adults (n = 606). Those with a history of a cardiovascular event were excluded. RESULTS: median age was 65 years (IQR 17), 58.6% women. People with diabetes and hypertension had the highest TPA (β exponent: 1.64; 95% CI 1.20-2.26), followed by people with hypertension alone (β exponent: 1.39; 95% CI 1.05-1.86), while people with diabetes alone had no differences (P = .379) with respect to the control group. CONCLUSION: This cross-sectional study, though limited, emphasizes the need for larger prospective studies to validate the clinical significance of these findings and highlights the importance of routine monitoring of subclinical atherosclerosis in hypertensive patients to assess the effectiveness of preventive therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".