MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408588937 · doi:10.1080/03155986.2025.2478327

The promotion of new energy refrigerated vehicles: an evolutionary game over complex networks

2025· article· en· W4408588937 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rong Wu, Lin Zhu, Man Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueINFOR Information Systems and Operational Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicInnovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPromotion (chess)Computer scienceBusinessPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The promotion and application of new energy refrigerated vehicles is a significant step toward the low-carbon development of cold chain logistics. This study considers carbon trading policies and corporate low-carbon preferences, constructs a complex network evolutionary game model for the diffusion of new energy refrigerated vehicles, and employs Matlab simulation software to investigate the decision-making interaction mechanism of cold chain logistics enterprises in a scale-free network. The results suggest that reasonable carbon trading prices can provide useful price signals for enterprises to lower carbon emissions, which supports the development of new energy refrigerated vehicles; A carbon quota total that exceeds a specific threshold will be unable to drive enterprises toward energy saving and emission reduction activities effectively; The diffusion effect of new energy refrigerated vehicles improves as the price elasticity coefficient of demand and the cross elasticity coefficient of demand price decrease; The diffusion rate remains constant as the network scale increases, while the time it takes for the network to achieve a stable state increases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.206
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINFOR Information Systems and Operational ResearchSame topicInnovation Diffusion and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207