The T cell receptor landscape of childhood brain tumors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The diverse T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire confers the ability to recognize an almost unlimited array of antigens. Characterization of antigen specificity of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is key for understanding antitumor immunity and for guiding the development of effective immunotherapies. Here, we report a large-scale comprehensive examination of the TCR landscape of TILs across the spectrum of pediatric brain tumors, the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in children. We show that a T cell clonality index can inform patient prognosis, where more clonality is associated with more favorable outcomes. Moreover, TCR similarity groups' assessment revealed patient clusters with defined human leukocyte antigen associations. Computational analysis of these clusters identified putative tumor antigens and peptides as targets for antitumor T cell immunity, which were functionally validated by T cell stimulation assays in vitro. Together, this study presents a framework for tumor antigen prediction based on in situ and in silico TIL TCR analyses. We propose that TCR-based investigations should inform tumor classification and precision immunotherapy development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".