MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408592413 · doi:10.63172/503917qpiiwi

A synopsis of game bird banding in New Zealand to year 2000

2025· article· en· W4408592413 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Murray Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueOccasional Publications of the Ornithological Society of New Zealand · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyFisheryGenealogyHistoryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The organised banding in New Zealand of birds that are seasonally hunted as game commenced in 1947 when wild grey ducks (Anas superciliosa) and mallards (A. platyrhynchos) were captured in Manawatu. From 1950, California quail (Callipepla californica) were caught and banded in central Otago and near Taupo as field studies of other game birds by Department of Internal Affairs Wildlife Branch staff commenced. At the same time, captive-raised mallards and common pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) were banded at release by acclimatisation societies, pre-empting a later legal requirement for banding of all released captive-raised game birds. By year 2000, approximately 150,000 of five species of introduced upland game birds (Galliformes) had been banded in New Zealand, including chukar partridge (Alectoris chukar), grey partridge (Perdix perdix), and red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa), the latter two species ultimately failing to acclimatise. From this total, 7,267 were reported shot. By year 2000, approximately 370,000 of six species of wetland game birds — black swan (Cygnus atratus), Canada goose (Branta canadensis), paradise shelduck (Tadorna variegata), Australasian shoveler (Spatula rhynchotis), grey duck, and mallard (and their hybrids) — had been banded. From this total, 62,566 were reported shot. Banding records, and details arising from the reported recoveries of banded birds, were initially administered by the Wildlife Branch, Department of Internal Affairs 1947–66, after which records were amalgamated with the nascent Ornithological Society of New Zealand’s bird ringing scheme for all other species, to form the New Zealand Bird Banding Scheme. Administered 1967–87 by the Wildlife Service, the scheme has been managed thereafter by the Department of Conservation. This narrative summarises the scales, locations, and durations of bandings of each game bird species, quantifies the recovery records for each, and reports on all published outcomes arising from the banding activities. Supplementary files provide recovery arrays (banding year by recovery year) for each of the wetland species to preserve historic records and encourage belated appraisal of much unprocessed band-recovery information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0080.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOccasional Publications of the Ornithological Society of New Zealand→Same topicAvian ecology and behavior→French-language works237,207→