MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408593421 · doi:10.63370/zfz.v12i1.10

Das Millennium Project: Die unvollständige Geschichte eines internationalen Think Tanks der Zukunftsforschung

2024· article· de· W4408593421 on OpenAlexaff
Cornelia Daheim, Jörg Rampacher, Clara Jöster-Morisse

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für Zukunftsforschung · 2024
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEconomic and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Das Millennium Project ist ein weltweiter Think Tank in Form einer non-profit NGO, die sich der Erkundung globaler Zukünfte verschrieben hat. Gegründet 1996, operiert es seither via so genannter Nodes, heute über 70 weltweit, die jeweils Zukunftsexpert:innen aus Wissenschaft, Politik, Wirt­schaft und Gesellschaft zusammenbringen; bekannt ist es zudem besonders für die regelmäßigen „State of the Future“ Reports. Der Artikel stellt das Projekt und seine Geschichte in Grundzügen entlang zentraler Meilensteine vor – anhand von Projekten und Themen, Akteuren und Grundprinzipien.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.027
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0270.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0050.007
Scholarly communication0.0110.008
Open science0.0010.010
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZeitschrift für ZukunftsforschungSame topicEconomic and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207