MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408597844 · doi:10.1016/j.net.2025.103590

Methodology and preliminary verification of generating heterogeneous multigroup microscopic cross-section libraries for neutron transport codes based on OpenMC

2025· article· en· W4408597844 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNuclear Engineering and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeutron transportSection (typography)Nuclear engineeringCross section (physics)Nuclear physicsNeutronComputer sciencePhysicsEngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advancements in reactor technology, particularly Generation IV and modular reactors, have introduced new challenges on the neutronics analysis due to their complex geometries and spectra. This study addresses these challenges by developing a methodology to generate heterogeneous multigroup microscopic cross-section libraries for three-dimensional neutron transport calculations using the OpenMC Monte Carlo code. The approach involves two-dimensional transport calculations in OpenMC for various fuel pins or supercells, generating multigroup microscopic cross-section libraries for isotopes relevant to burnup, temperature, and moderator density. These cross-sections are then post-processed and used in three-dimensional core neutron transport calculations with the CRANE deterministic code. This method combines the high accuracy of Monte Carlo methods with the computational efficiency of deterministic approaches. Preliminary 2D verification was conducted using benchmark problems, including PWR fuel assemblies from the VERA series, a fast reactor pin, a 3600 MWth subassembly, and a 1000 MWth metallic fuel core. Results indicate that the coupled OpenMC/CRANE method accurately captures reactivity and isotopic evolution during burnup, suggesting potential improvements in accuracy and efficiency for neutronic simulations of advanced reactor designs. • Developed a method for generating heterogeneous multigroup microscopic cross-section libraries. • Combined Monte Carlo accuracy with deterministic efficiency. • Conducted preliminary 2D verification with PWR and fast reactor benchmark problems. • Achieved accurate reactivity, isotopic evolution, and power distribution predictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.654
Threshold uncertainty score0.700

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it