MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408602275 · doi:10.1117/12.3043525

Advancements in low-loss silicon nitride surface grating couplers

2025· article· en· W4408602275 on OpenAlexaff
Radovan Korček, William D. Fraser, Quentin Wilmart, David Medina Quiroz, Samson Edmond, Thalia Dominguez-Bucio, Frédéric Y. Gardes, Maziyar Milanizadeh, Jens H. Schmid, Pavel Cheben, Winnie N. Ye, Laurent Vivien, Carlos Alonso‐Ramos, Daniel Benedikovič

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceGratingSilicon nitrideOptoelectronicsSiliconNitrideOpticsNanotechnologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past decade, silicon nitride (Si3N4) has become a leading platform in integrated photonics due to its excellent passive functionalities and CMOS compatibility. Si3N4’s unique properties have driven advancements in optical communications, nonlinear optics, and quantum information sciences. Efficient interfacing between optical fibers and photonic chips remains a key challenge. This can be solved by implementing surface grating couplers, which couple light into fibers placed above the chip, enabling wafer-scale testing. However, the moderate index contrast of Si3N4 hinders their performance. We explore the latest developments in high-efficiency grating couplers on the Si3N4 platform, focusing on innovative designs like high-index material overlays and optimized grating structures to improve coupling efficiency and expand Si3N4 applications in advanced optical technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotonic and Optical Devices→French-language works237,207→