MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408602782 · doi:10.1117/12.3044201

Optimization of photonic devices for integrated and free-space optical systems

2025· article· en· W4408602782 on OpenAlexaff
Daniele Melati, Zindine Mokeddem, Sarra Salhi, Jian Cao, Sandeep-Yadav Golla, Warren Kut King Kan, Gervasio D'Anzieri, Laurent Vivien, Carlos Alonso‐Ramos, Delphine Marris‐Morini, Éric Cassan, Winnie Ye, Shahrzad Khajavi, Xiaochen Xin, Pavel Cheben, Jens H. Schmid, Dan‐Xia Xu, Yuri Grinberg, Muhammad Al-Digeil

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotonicsComputer scienceFree spaceIntegrated opticsPhotonic integrated circuitSpace (punctuation)Electronic engineeringOptoelectronicsOpticsMaterials sciencePhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this invited talk, we will present our recent work on the design and optimization of photonic devices and metasurfaces for both integrated optical systems and free-space applications. We will discuss how the use of advanced techniques based on optimization and machine learning can help efficiently exploring large design spaces, giving access to complex geometries that offers improved performance but cannot be easily handled with classical design approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.437
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207