MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408609032 · doi:10.1109/tii.2025.3545106

Adaptive Ordinal Sample-Weighted Meta-ResNet for Fault Severity Classification Under Class Imbalance

2025· article· en· W4408609032 on OpenAlexaff
Qifa Xu, Zhenglei Jin, Cuixia Jiang, Zheng Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Class (philosophy)Residual neural networkComputer scienceSample (material)StatisticsData miningMathematicsArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In intelligent fault diagnosis, fault severity classification with class imbalance remains a tremendous challenge. To simultaneously consider relative natural order in fault severity and class imbalance, we propose the adaptive ordinal sample-weighted meta residual network (AOSW-MRN). The AOSW-MRN model uses a weighting network and a meta-model cloned from the residual network to create a nonlinear weighted mapping. It adaptively learns sample weights from a balanced and clean-label meta-dataset, training a model robust to imbalance and ordinal relationships. We validate its effectiveness in two real-world case studies with different imbalance rates. Experimental results demonstrate that our model outperforms several existing Start-of-the-Art models regardless of classification and regression performance since it considers the ordinality of samples in the feature space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score0.868

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial InformaticsSame topicAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207