MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408609467 · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3553034

Real-Time Decision Support System for Dynamic Optimization in Multi-Product Process Manufacturing

2025· article· en· W4408609467 on OpenAlexafffund
Mustapha Belmouadden, Camélia Dadouchi, Robert Pellerin

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicManufacturing Process and Optimization
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersMitacs
KeywordsComputer scienceProcess (computing)Product (mathematics)Decision support systemManufacturing engineeringIndustrial engineeringProcess managementProcess engineeringData miningEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The implementation of adaptive optimization in multi-product process manufacturing is a crucial strategy for the reduction of unplanned downtime and the enhancement of overall productivity. Nevertheless, the availability of real-time decision support tools for dynamic adjustments in large-scale industries is currently limited. In response to this challenge, we propose a novel model that processes data collected from extensive manufacturing operations. By leveraging Explainable Artificial Intelligence, we developed a real-time decision support system designed to dynamically adjust process parameters following varying input variables. The proposed model achieved a capture rate of 62% of the minority of products that cause micro-stoppages due to non-compliance with specifications. This approach provides a robust framework for adaptive optimization in complex and large-scale manufacturing environments, enhancing productivity and resilience against unplanned disruptions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score0.936

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicManufacturing Process and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207