MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408609510 · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3552755

A Design Framework for Reconfigurable Intelligent Metasurfaces Enabling Full-Space Beamforming Using Auxiliary Surface Waves

2025· article· en· W4408609510 on OpenAlexafffund
Tianke Qiu, George V. Eleftheriades

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBeamformingComputer scienceElectronic engineeringSpace (punctuation)Computer architectureTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electromagnetic metasurfaces (MTSs) and Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces (RISs) have revolutionized wave manipulation by enabling precise control over the reflected and transmitted waves. While traditional MTSs rely on static designs, RISs incorporate tunable elements, allowing dynamic adaptation to external illuminations for real-time wavefront optimization. This paper provides a complete design framework for RISs based on the Method of Moments (MoM) to establish a multiport network and an efficient optimization scheme. By incorporating auxiliary surface waves and accounting for mutual coupling, precise control over amplitude and phase can be achieved. As a result, our designs enable wide-angle beamsteering of up to 70° in a single plane, as well as out-of-plane anomalous reflection. To further demonstrate the capabilities of the design framework for complex wave manipulation, a Chebyshev pattern with a -20 dB sidelobe level, as well as sector patterns in a single plane and across a hemisphere, are achieved using the designed RIS. The effectiveness of the proposed method is validated through full-wave simulations, supplemented by an additional measurement of a static MTS exhibiting out-of-plane anomalous reflection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207