MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408613658 · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/03/037

Neutrino flux sensitivity to the next galactic core-collapse supernova in COSINUS

2025· article· en· W4408613658 on OpenAlexaff
G. Angloher, Mariano Cababié, I. Colantoni, I. Dafinei, Alessio Ludovico de Santis, N. Di Marco, L. Einfalt, F. Ferella, F. Ferroni, S. Fichtinger, A. Filipponi, T. Frank, M. Friedl, Z. W. Ge, Matti Heikinheimo, Martin Hughes, Katri Huitu, Moritz Kellermann, R. Maji, M. Mancuso, L. Pagnanini, F. Petricca, S. Pirro, F. Pröbst, G. Profeta, Andrei Puiu, F. Reindl, K. Schäffner, J. Schieck, P. Schreiner, C. Schwertner, K. Shera, M. Stahlberg, A. Stendahl, M. Stukel, Cesare Tresca, F. Wagner, Shijing Yue, V. Zema, Y. Zhu, G. Pagliaroli

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsSnolab
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsNeutrinoSupernovaAstrophysicsFlux (metallurgy)Sensitivity (control systems)Type II supernovaAstronomyCore (optical fiber)Nuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract While neutrinos are often treated as a background for many dark matter experiments, these particles offer a new avenue for physics: the detection of core-collapse supernovae. Supernovae are extremely energetic, violent and complex events that mark the death of massive stars. During their collapse stars emit a large number of neutrinos in a short burst. These neutrinos carry 99% of the emitted energy which makes their detection fundamental in understanding supernovae. This paper illustrates how COSINUS (Cryogenic Observatory for SIgnatures seen in Next-generation Underground Searches), a sodium iodide (NaI) based dark matter search, will be sensitive to the next galactic core-collapse supernova. The experiment is composed of two separate detectors which will respond to far away and nearby supernovae. The inner core of the experiment will consist of NaI crystals operating as scintillating calorimeters. These crystals will mainly be sensitive to the Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering (CEνNS) against Na and I nuclei. The low mass of the cryogenic detectors enables the experiment to identify close supernovae within 1 kpc without pileup. The crystals will see up to hundreds of CEνNS events from a supernova happening at 200 pc. They reside at the center of a large cylindrical 230 T water tank, instrumented with 30 photomultiplier tubes. This tank acts simultaneously as a passive and active shield able to detect the Cherenkov radiation induced by impinging charged particles from ambient and cosmogenic radioactivity. A supernova near the Milky Way Center (10 kpc) will be easily detected inducing ∼60 measurable events, and the water tank will have a 3σ sensitivity to supernovae up to 22 kpc, seeing ∼10 events. This paper shows how, even without dedicated optimization, modern dark matter experiments will also be able to play their part in the multi-messenger effort to detect the next galactic core-collapse supernova.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle PhysicsSame topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207