MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408621591 · doi:10.1016/j.ijregi.2025.100599

Lessons and updates from India's National Tuberculosis Elimination Program – bold decisions and innovative ways of fast-tracking progress toward ending tuberculosis

2025· review· en· W4408621591 on OpenAlexaff
Urvashi B. Singh, Kiran Rade, Raghuram Rao, Nishant Kumar, Sanjay Kumar Mattoo, Sreenivas Achuthan Nair, Alimuddin Zumla, Suvanand Sahu

Bibliographic record

VenueIJID Regions · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersQIAGEN
KeywordsTuberculosisTracking (education)Political sciencePsychologyMedicinePedagogyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• India bears the highest tuberculosis burden. • Strong political commitment cascaded from the Prime Minister to local stakeholders. • Innovations in diagnosis, treatment, vaccines, and digital health were prioritized. • Socio-economic impact was mitigated by direct benefit transfer schemes. • Decentralized initiatives of tuberculosis-free villages/districts empowered local stakeholders. India has the highest burden of tuberculosis (TB) globally. Strong political commitment, bold targets, and innovations have been the hallmark of the TB response. Lessons learned in India, such as understanding the diversity of TB epidemiology, approaches beyond conventional response strategies, bold decisions, and innovations, are invaluable for the global TB response. The India TB response is supported by strong political commitment cascading from the Prime Minister to local stakeholders. An initial key step was the sub-national assessment of the diverse TB burden and recognition of the public and private health care landscape. India effectively demonstrated innovative models to meaningfully engage all stakeholders, leveraging technology to bridge gaps. Community participation and social engineering movements were used to reduce stigma and address the nutritional needs of TB patients. Patient-support systems through an innovative adoption program, crowdsourced solutions, and direct benefit cash transfers were implemented to mitigate the socio-economic impact of TB. Decentralized initiatives such as the TB-Free Panchayat, district, and city schemes empowered local stakeholders and encouraged healthy sub-national competition. Advances in research and development of screening tools, rapid molecular diagnostics, real-time integrated digital surveillance systems such as Ni-kshay, and innovations such as telemedicine, call centers, direct benefit transfers, and artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools are accelerating the TB response in India.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0060.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIJID RegionsSame topicTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207