MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408628169 · doi:10.1186/s40359-025-02516-3

Construction and evaluation of nomogram for risk prediction of cognitive impairment in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease comorbidity

2025· article· en· W4408628169 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. Luo, Wen Yang, Yang Liu, HongLian Ji, Xinran Li, Jing Bai, Tiejun Liu, WeiBin Chen, Xiao Li, Guoxin Mo, Wenyuan Li, AiShuang Fu, YanLei Ge

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Psychology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNomogramComorbidityPulmonary diseaseCognitive impairmentDiseasePsychologyCognitionClinical psychologyMedicineIntensive care medicineInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) remains a serious public health problem globally, and the mortality rate for older COPD patients with cognitive impairment is almost three times that of older patients with cognitive impairment or COPD. The aim of this study was to construct a nomogram prediction model for the risk of comorbid cognitive impairment in COPD patients and to evaluate its clinical application. It helps to detect cognitive impairment in COPD patients at an early stage and give them effective interventions in time, so as to delay the progression of COPD patients and improve their prognosis. METHODS: In this study, patients with COPD hospitalized at the Affiliated Hospital of North China University of Science and Technology were evaluated for cognitive function using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA) scale after stabilization of acute exacerbations. Participants were stratified into two groups: a case group (with cognitive impairment) and a control group (without cognitive impairment), based on predefined MoCA cutoff scores(< 26scores). Based on the basic characteristics of the patients and the laboratory indexes after stabilization of acute exacerbations, we conducted statistical analyses, screened out the risk factors and established the Nomogram Prediction Model by using the R software, and finally, we evaluated the clinical value of the model through the calculation of ROC curves for sensitivity, specificity and kappa value. Finally, the sensitivity, specificity and Kappa value were calculated by ROC curve to evaluate the clinical value of the model. RESULTS: After statistical analysis, C-reactive protein (CRP) and homocysteine (Hcy) were found to be the risk factors for combined cognitive impairment in COPD patients, and the Nomogram prediction model was constructed by combining CRP and Hcy and plotted the ROC curve, and it was found that its model finally screened the critical value of the total score of 62.55, and the area under the ROC curve of the model was 0.870, and the sensitivity was 84.7%, and the specificity was 80.4%, indicating that it has a high degree of consistency with the actual results, which indicated that the consistency between the prediction results and the actual results was better, and it had a higher clinical application value. CONCLUSIONS: CRP and Hcy are closely associated with comorbid cognitive impairment in COPD patients after stabilization of acute exacerbations, and increased levels of CRP and Hcy are associated with an increased risk of comorbid cognitive impairment in COPD patients. Combining both CRP and Hcy to create a nomogram model for predicting comorbid cognitive impairment in patients with COPD has good predictive ability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC PsychologySame topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchFrench-language works237,207