Modernity Psychosis: The Evolutionary Psychoanalytic Social Theory of Eli Sagan
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eli Sagan’s work rests on the assumption that psychoanalytic theory can be enormously useful in understanding society, provided that theory is used in a critical and non-reductionist manner. Robert Bellah writes of Sagan’s The Lust to Annihilate: A Psychoanalytic Study of Violence in Ancient Greek Culture (1979), “Not since E.R. Dodds’ The Greeks and the Irrational has anyone made so major a contribution to the understanding of the development of Greek moral ideas.” Dorothy Dinnerstein wrote of Sagan’s At the Dawn of Tyranny (1985), “This is a wonderfully original and incisive book—a book with profound bearing upon the psychology and politics that now threaten a sudden end to life on earth.” Karl Menninger wrote: “Eli Sagan gives us deep insights and profound thoughts relevant to our imminent self-destruction.” In addition to his many intellectual achievements, Eli has been active in national U.S. politics and even holds the distinction of having been listed twice on the John Dean/Richard Nixon “Enemies List.” This essay is a summary of presentations given by Eli Sagan and me on September 12, 2012—sponsored by the Toronto Psychoanalytic Society and co-sponsored by the Psychohistory Forum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it