MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408646494 · doi:10.1186/s41747-025-00570-5

Connectivity related to major brain functions in Alzheimer disease progression: microstructural properties of the cingulum bundle and its subdivision using diffusion-weighted MRI

2025· article· en· W4408646494 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mattia Ricchi, Guido Campani, Anastasiia Nagmutdinova, Villiam Bortolotti, Danilo Greco, Carlo Golini, James T. Grist, Leonardo Brizi, Claudia Testa

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Radiology Experimental · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on AgingCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthGenentechIXICOH. Lundbeck A/SServierEisaiNorthern California Institute for Research and EducationPfizerNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationU.S. Department of DefenseAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeMeso Scale DiagnosticsUniversity of Southern CaliforniaBioClinicaBristol-Myers SquibbEli Lilly and CompanyBiogen
KeywordsCingulum (brain)Diffusion MRINeuroscienceFractional anisotropyTractographyWhite matterPsychologyUncinate fasciculusAlzheimer's diseaseDementiaMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingPathologyRadiologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The cingulum bundle is a brain white matter fasciculus associated with the cingulate gyrus. It connects areas from the temporal to the frontal lobe. It is composed of fibers with different terminations, lengths, and structural properties, related to specific brain functions. We aimed to automatically reconstruct this fasciculus in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and to assess whether trajectories have different microstructural properties in relation to dementia progression. METHODS: Multi-shell high angular resolution diffusion imaging-HARDI image datasets from the "Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative"-ADNI repository of 10 AD, 18 MCI, and 21 cognitive normal (CN) subjects were used to reconstruct three subdivisions of the cingulum bundle, using a probabilistic approach, combined with measurements of diffusion tensor and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging metrics in each subdivision. RESULTS: The subdivisions exhibit different pathways, terminations, and structural characteristics. We found differences in almost all the diffusivity metrics among the subdivisions (p < 0.001 for all the metrics) and between AD versus CN and MCI versus CN subjects for mean diffusivity (p = 0.007-0.038), radial diffusivity (p = 0.008-0.049) and neurite dispersion index (p = 0.005-0.049). CONCLUSION: Results from tractography analysis of the subdivisions of the cingulum bundle showed an association in the role of groups of fibers with their functions and the variance of their properties in relation to dementia progression. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The cingulum bundle is a complex tract with several pathways and terminations related to many cognitive functions. A probabilistic automatic approach is proposed to reconstruct its subdivisions, showing different microstructural properties and variations. A larger sample of patients is needed to confirm results and elucidate the role of diffusion parameters in characterizing alterations in brain function and progression to dementia. KEY POINTS: The microstructure of the cingulum bundle is related to brain cognitive functions. A probabilistic automatic approach is proposed to reconstruct the subdivisions of the cingulum bundle by diffusion-weighted images. The subdivisions showed different microstructural properties and variations in relation to the progression of dementia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Radiology ExperimentalSame topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207