Ultrasound-Guided External Ventricular Drain Insertion After Decompressive Craniectomy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound guidance offers real-time visualization of patient-specific anatomy during external ventricular drain (EVD) insertion. A craniectomy defect provides a sonolucent window, enabling the use of a large, low-frequency probe with deep penetration and a wide field of view. While specialized burr-hole probes exist, use of a curvilinear probe through a craniectomy defect for bedside EVD placement has not been previously described. METHODS: Using a curvilinear probe, we performed ultrasound-guided bedside insertion of a left frontal EVD through a hemicraniectomy flap. RESULTS: Bedside ultrasound enabled visualization of the entire supratentorial ventricular system. Drain insertion was successfully performed, with immediate sonographic visualization of the catheter tip in the left frontal horn. Placement was confirmed with a computed tomography scan. CONCLUSIONS: Bedside ultrasound-guided EVD insertion in post-craniectomy patients can be a valuable method for safely accessing the ventricle in the face of abnormal or distorted anatomy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".