Improving the Efficiency of Ultrasound and Microbubble Mediated Gene Delivery by Manipulation of Microbubble Lipid Composition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ultrasound and microbubble-mediated gene delivery is emerging as a powerful nonviral gene delivery approach due to its ability to target various tissues. Since microbubble cavitation plays a crucial role in gene delivery, factors affecting cavitation, such as microbubble composition, size, ultrasound pressure, frequency, and pulse interval, can directly affect the efficiency of gene delivery. The effect of ultrasound parameters on gene delivery efficiency has been systematically investigated in numerous studies. However, relatively few studies have investigated the influence of different microbubble compositions on gene delivery. In this paper, we report that microbubbles made with the same lipids but different poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) derivatives lead to significantly different gene delivery efficiencies in vitro . Moreover, we show that the type of PEG derivative used in microbubble formulations greatly influences the acoustic response of microbubbles (i.e., resonance frequency and frequency-dependent attenuation coefficient), thus explaining the differences in gene delivery efficiencies. Our results highlight that changing a single component in the microbubble formulation, i.e., the type of PEG derivative, can improve gene delivery efficiency by 3-fold. This comparative study of microbubbles made with different PEG derivatives may help researchers in designing microbubble formulations for optimal gene delivery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it