MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408666331 · doi:10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100479

Circadian rhythm disruption and polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4408666331 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tara Heydari, Prakash V. A. K. Ramdass

Bibliographic record

VenueAJOG Global Reports · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian function and disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolycystic ovaryCircadian rhythmMeta-analysisRhythmMedicineInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine if circadian rhythm disruption (CRD) is associated with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Our objective was to pool the overall mean differences in biomarkers of CRD (including melatonin levels, morning and evening cortisol levels, and sleep efficiency) between PCOS patients and controls. We hypothesized that CRD will be more prominent in patients with PCOS. Data sources: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, ClinicalTrials.Gov, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted from inception until 2024 using the following MeSH terms "circadian rhythm" OR "sleep disturbance" OR "melatonin" AND "polycystic ovary syndrome." Citation search supplemented the systematic database search. Study eligibility criteria: Inclusion criteria were women with PCOS, original case-control, cross-sectional, and cohort studies that identify parameters of CRD (melatonin, cortisol, and sleep disturbance). Exclusion criteria were women with endocrine and metabolic co-morbidities, menopausal women, case reports, review studies, animal studies, abstracts, and conference presentations. There was no time restriction for year of publication. Study appraisal and synthesis methods: Two investigators (T.H. and P.R.) assessed the quality of the studies included using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Forest plots were created using the Open Meta Analyst software. Publication bias was assessed in Egger's and Begg's tests. Results: A total of 16 studies were included in the systematic review and 12 studies were included in the meta-analysis (N=1,100 women [531 PCOS patients and 569 controls]). Pooled analysis showed that the mean difference in melatonin levels between PCOS patients and controls was 14.294 pg/mL, 95% CI [6.895, 21.693]. The overall mean difference in morning and evening cortisol between PCOS patients and controls was 1.103 pg/mL, 95% CI [-1.058, 3.265], and 3.574 pg/mL, 95% CI [1.741, 5.407], respectively. Pooled difference in mean sleep efficiency scores between PCOS patients and controls was -4.059, 95% CI [-6.752, -1.366]. Risk of bias assessment showed that NOS scores ranged from 7 to 9. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis provides evidence that circadian rhythm disruption is positively associated with polycystic ovary syndrome. This is substantiated by differences in parameters indicative of circadian rhythm disruption, including melatonin levels, evening cortisol, and sleep efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAJOG Global ReportsSame topicOvarian function and disordersFrench-language works237,207