Experimental and numerical investigation of the impact of helical coil targets on laser-driven proton and carbon accelerations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Laser-driven ion acceleration, as produced by interaction of a high-intensity laser with a target, is a growing field of interest. One of the current challenges is to enhance the acceleration process, i.e., to increase the produced ion energy and the ion number and to shape the energy distribution for future applications. In this paper, we investigate the effect of helical coil (HC) targets on the laser–matter interaction process using a 150 TW laser. We demonstrate that HC targets significantly enhance proton acceleration, improving energy bunching and beam focusing and increasing the cutoff energy. For the first time, we extend this analysis to carbon ions, revealing a marked reduction in the number of low-energy carbon ions and the potential for energy bunching and post-acceleration through an optimized HC design. Simulations using the particle-in-cell code SOPHIE confirm the experimental results, providing insights into the current propagation and ion synchronization mechanisms in HCs. Our findings suggest that HC targets can be optimized for multispecies ion acceleration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it