Evaluating the Impact of Individualized Health Education and Cognitive Training on Clopidogrel Treatment in Elderly Stroke Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the nursing effect of individualized health education combined with cognitive training on clopidogrel treatment in elderly stroke patients. Methods: One hundred and twelve elderly stroke patients treated in our neurology department from January to June 2019 were randomly divided into experimental and control groups. The control group received clopidogrel therapy, conventional nursing, rehabilitation exercises, and conventional health education. The experimental group received the same treatment plus individualized health education and cognitive training. The intervention effect was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Health Education Questionnaire, the activity of daily living scale (ADL), and the Nurse Job Satisfaction Questionnaire before intervention, at 4 weeks and at 12 weeks. Results: < .05). Conclusion: Individualized health education combined with cognitive training effectively enhances cognitive function, stroke awareness, health education adherence, and self-care ability in elderly stroke patients receiving clopidogrel treatment, thereby improving their overall quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".