#AFRINGEMINORITY: TIKTOK’S PLATFORM VERNACULAR AND FRAMING COLLECTIVE IDENTITY IN THE FREEDOM CONVOY PROTESTS*
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study uses a qualitative thematic analysis drawn from 813 TikTok videos to examine how TikTok’s platform vernacular shapes the expression of collective identity vis-à-vis collective action frames. This work explores the contentious case of the Canadian far-right freedom convoy protests between January 29 and February 21, 2022. This study finds that freedom convoy supporters’ framing of collective identity relied upon antipathy toward state intervention and nationalistic pride that desired a return to “normal,” moralized in the name of “freedom.” Additionally, this work finds that this identity work was augmented through three key vernacular practices: alternative broadcasting, monologuing, and audio memes. These vernacular practices shaped supporters’ identity work, instructing how the movement was collectively rendered on TikTok. Overall, this work contributes to our understanding of how social movements’ identity work practices are inextricably bounded through TikTok’s unique communicative culture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it