Genetic characteristics of anelloviruses detected in individual viromes of children with acute respiratory symptoms using the metagenomic approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
More than 20 years after the discovery of the first anelloviruses (AVs), they still remain a mysterious group of viruses. To date, there is no clear understanding of their impact on the host organism, although information is emerging about their participation in various pathologies. Unfortunately, the widespread distribution of AVs makes it difficult to determine their significance. However, it is well known that AVs are an important component of the human virome. We assessed the abundance of AVs in viromes from four individual nasal and pharyngeal samples from children with respiratory symptoms using a metagenomic approach. Three of samples were positive for bocavirus, influenza virus A and respiratory syncytial virus, while one sample was negative for any respiratory viruses in standard PCR diagnosis. AVs were detected in all samples, namely Torque teno mini virus (TTMV). The greatest abundance and diversity of AVs [Torque teno virus (TTV), TTMV and Torque teno midi virus (TTMDV)] were observed in a diseased patient who had an absence of respiratory viruses. It is suggested that an activated immune system to combat the main pathogens, against the background of which the number of AVs decreases, may explain the reduced diversity of anellome in other patients. We also compared the results of the metagenomic workflows and qPCR for major respiratory viruses, which were in agreement. In addition, metagenomic sequencing made it possible to obtain additional data on viral genomes in order to establish their taxonomic identification and characterize individual viral profiles in patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".