MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408684079 · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2025.102467

Dissecting cardiovascular disease-associated noncoding genetic variants using human iPSC models

2025· review· en· W4408684079 on OpenAlexafffund
Saif Dababneh, Hosna Babini, Verónica Jiménez-Sábado, Sheila S. Teves, Kyoung-Han Kim, Glen F. Tibbits

Bibliographic record

VenueStem Cell Reports · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversity of British ColumbiaSimon Fraser UniversityBC Children's Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMichael Smith Health Research BCStem Cell NetworkUniversity of British ColumbiaHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsBiologyDiseaseGeneticsComputational biologyGeneInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advancements in genomics have revealed hundreds of loci associated with cardiovascular diseases, highlighting the role genetic variants play in disease pathogenesis. Notably, most variants lie within noncoding genomic regions that modulate transcription factor binding, chromatin accessibility, and thereby the expression levels and cell type specificity of gene transcripts. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) have emerged as a powerful tool to delineate the pathogenicity of such variants and elucidate the underlying transcriptional mechanisms. Our review discusses the basics of noncoding variant-mediated pathogenesis, the methodologies utilized, and how hiPSC-based heart models can be leveraged to dissect the mechanisms of noncoding variants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStem Cell ReportsSame topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207