MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408685727 · doi:10.1117/12.3041573

Utilizing near-infrared spectroscopy to monitor and assess muscle spasticity in children with cerebral palsy undergoing Botox treatment, a feasibility study

2025· article· en· W4408685727 on OpenAlexaff
Mehdi Nouri Zadeh, Kishore Mulpuri, Jocelyn Begin, Maria Juricic, Babak Shadgan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCerebral palsySpasticityPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Cerebral palsy (CP) is a common pediatric motor disability characterized by motor impairments and spasticity. This study assesses the feasibility of employing near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to objectively evaluate muscle spasticity in children with CP undergoing botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) treatment. Methods: Three participants aged 5–16 years with spastic lower limbs were monitored for changes in the tissue oxygenation index (TOI%) and spasticity levels using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) over 6 months. NIRS measurements were collected at baseline and several intervals following BoNT-A administration. Results: Transient increases in TOI% were observed during the first 2–4 weeks post-injection, coinciding with reductions in spasticity. However, by 6 months, TOI% values experienced a moderate decline. Conclusions: This descriptive analysis highlights the potential of NIRS as a non-invasive tool for real-time monitoring of muscle spasticity treatment efficacy. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate these findings and establish NIRS as a complement to existing clinical tools for muscle spasticity evaluation and management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders→French-language works237,207→