Validation of Quarter-Life Management Program Module Based on Solution-Focused Therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A quarter-life crisis is a condition related to fulfilling early adult developmental tasks. Failing to fulfil these tasks can disrupt productivity and social relationships, cause emotional instability, and increase the risks of mental disorders. The Quarter-Life Management Program Based on Solution-Focused Therapy is designed to treat individuals aged 18-25 years with quarter-life crisis who experience education, employment, social relations, or personal identity problems. This study aimed to validate the program module. The content validation procedure carried out through professional judgment, resulted in an Aiken’s V score of 0.91. The functional validation procedure was carried out through experimental research on 7 participants in experimental groups and 7 participants in waitlist-control group. The results of the within-subject test analysis indicate that the implementation of the program did not have a significant effect in reducing quarter-life crisis in the experimental group (p= 0.052). However, the program was effective in increasing a more positive self-perspective and enhancing problem-solving abilities (p= 0.035 and p= 0.007). In contrast, the waitlist-control group, which did not receive the program, showed no changes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".