Origin of Siderite and Baryte in a Carbonate-Replacement Ag-Pb-Zn-Cu Sulphide Deposit: Walton, Nova Scotia, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Siderite and baryte are common non-sulphide phases in sedimentary exhalative (SEDEX) deposits, but their formation remains poorly understood. Siderite is important as an exploration vector in some deposits, whereas baryte is important as a S source in some deposits. The past-producing Walton deposit (Nova Scotia, Canada) consists of two ore types: (1) a sulphide body primarily hosted by sideritised Viséan Macumber Formation limestone (0.41 Mt; head grade of 350 g/t Ag, 4.28% Pb, 1.29% Zn, and 0.52% Cu), and (2) an overlying massive baryte body of predominantly microcrystalline baryte (4.5 Mt of >90% baryte). This study used optical microscopy, SEM-EDS, cathodoluminescence (CL), LA-ICP-MS, and SIMS sulphur isotope analysis of siderite and baryte to elucidate their origin and role in deposit formation. Siderite replaces limestone and contains ≤9 wt. % Mn, is LREE-depleted (PAAS-normalised REEY diagrams), and has low (<20) Y/Ho ratios. Sideritisation occurred due to dissimilatory iron reduction (DIR) that led to the breakdown of Fe-Mn-oxyhydroxides and organic matter, as indicated by light δ13CVPBD values and negative Y anomalies. The baryte body is dominated by a microcrystalline variety that locally develops a radial texture and coarsens to a tabular variety; it also occurs intergrown with, and as veins in, massive sulphides. Based on fluid inclusion data from previous studies, the coarser baryte types grew from a hot (>200 °C) saline (25 wt. % NaCl) fluid containing CO2-CH4 and liquid petroleum. Marine sulphate δ34SVCDT values typical of the Viséan (~15‰) characterise the baryte body and some tabular baryte types, whereas heavier (~20‰) and lighter (~10‰) values typify the remaining tabular types. The variations in tabular baryte relate to distinct zones identified by CL imaging and are attributed to the sulphate-driven anaerobic oxidation of methane (SDAOM) and oxidation of excess H2S after sulphide precipitation. These results highlight the importance of hydrocarbons (methane and organic matter) in the formation of both the siderite and the baryte at Walton and that DIR and the SDAOM can be important contributing processes in the formation of SEDEX deposits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".