MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408689607 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-c04n1

Anti-inflammatory effects of polyglycerol sulfates and natural polyanions in type 2 inflammation

2025· preprint· en· W4408689607 on OpenAlexaff
Clemens Krage, Peyman Malek Mohammadi Nouri, Jens Dernedde, Jayachandran N. Kizhakkedathu, Sarah Hedtrich, Rainer Haag, Katharina Achazi

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCurcumin's Biomedical Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInflammationNatural (archaeology)ChemistryImmunologyMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Type 2 inflammation is an essential defense mechanism of the innate and adaptive immune systems, but when dysregulated, it can cause chronic atopic diseases like allergic asthma and atopic dermatitis. Thymic stromal lymphoprotein (TSLP) helps drive type 2 inflammation by guiding T cells toward a type 2 helper cell (TH2) subtype and stimulating B cells’ antibody production. Fibronectin (FN) has recently been found at elevated levels in the plasma of children with atopic dermatitis and shown a potential proinflammatory role in bronchial epithelium tissue models. Both proteins’ surface charges suggest potential interaction with charged molecules. Seeking new strategies against type 2 inflammation, we found that negatively charged polyglycerol sulfates strongly bind to TSLP and FN. We confirmed that these molecules inhibit inflammation by reducing the TSLP-mediated type 2 polarization of CD4+ T cells. We found that adding polyglycerol sulfate to FN-triggered inflamed bronchial epithelium models reduced TSLP expression and interleukin 6 secretion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicCurcumin's Biomedical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207