MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408693799 · doi:10.1186/s13321-025-00979-5

An interpretable deep geometric learning model to predict the effects of mutations on protein–protein interactions using large-scale protein language model

2025· article· en· W4408693799 on OpenAlexafffund
Caiya Zhang, Yanzhi Sun, Pingzhao Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cheminformatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMachine Learning in Bioinformatics
Canadian institutionsChildren’s Health Research InstituteLawson Health Research InstituteUniversity of ManitobaWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsComputer scienceScale (ratio)Artificial intelligenceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are central to the mechanisms of signaling pathways and immune responses, which can help us understand disease etiology. Therefore, there is a significant need for efficient and rapid automated approaches to predict changes in PPIs. In recent years, there has been a significant increase in applying deep learning techniques to predict changes in binding affinity between the original protein complex and its mutant variants. Particularly, the adoption of graph neural networks (GNNs) has gained prominence for their ability to learn representations of protein-protein complexes. However, the conventional GNNs have mainly concentrated on capturing local features, often disregarding the interactions among distant elements that hold potential important information. In this study, we have developed a transformer-based graph neural network to extract features of the mutant segment from the three-dimensional structure of protein-protein complexes. By embracing both local and global features, the approach ensures a more comprehensive understanding of the intricate relationships, thus promising more accurate predictions of binding affinity changes. To enhance the representation capability of protein features, we incorporate a large-scale pre-trained protein language model into our approach and employ the global protein feature it provides. The proposed model is shown to be able to predict the mutation changes in binding affinity with a root mean square error of 1.10 and a Pearson correlation coefficient of near 0.71, as demonstrated by performance on test and validation cases. Our experiments on all five datasets, including both single mutant and multiple mutant cases, demonstrate that our model outperforms four state-of-the-art baseline methods, and the efficacy was subjected to comprehensive experimental evaluation. Our study introduces a transformer-based graph neural network approach to accurately predict changes in protein-protein interactions (PPIs). By integrating local and global features and leveraging pretrained protein language models, our model outperforms state-of-the-art methods across diverse datasets. The results of this study can provide new views for studying immune responses and disease etiology related to protein mutations. Furthermore, this approach may contribute to other biological or biochemical studies related to PPIs.Scientific contribution Our scientific contribution lies in the development of a novel transformer-based graph neural network tailored to predict changes in protein-protein interactions (PPIs) with excellent accuracy. By seamlessly integrating both local and global features extracted from the three-dimensional structure of protein-protein complexes, and leveraging the rich representations provided by pretrained protein language models, our approach surpasses existing methods across diverse datasets. Our findings may offer novel insights for the understanding of complex disease etiology associated with protein mutations. The novel tool can be applicable to various biological and biochemical investigations involving protein mutations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of CheminformaticsSame topicMachine Learning in BioinformaticsFrench-language works237,207