MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Detection of 532nm Laser Light Using a TiO2 Nanotube Integrated Microwave Resonator

2023· article· en· W4408703555 on OpenAlexafffund
Keatin Colegrave, Mahnaz Alijani, Zahra Sarpanah, Jan M. Macák, Mohammad H. Zarifi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsLaserResonatorMaterials scienceMicrowaveOptoelectronicsLaser lightNanotubeOpticsCarbon nanotubeNanotechnologyComputer sciencePhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optical sensors play an important role in applications of the biomedical industry and in monitoring potentially hazardous gases. This paper presents an integration of TiO2 nanotube (TNT) membranes coated on a microwave split ring resonator (SRR) to detect a 532 nm laser light. A SRR was designed with integrated TNT membranes at an operational frequency of 8.006 GHz with a resonant notch amplitude of −11.4 dB. The illumination of TiO2 changed the dielectric properties (optical properties of the TiO2) of the material, and this variation was monitored through the transmission coefficient S21. The designed integrated microwave resonator achieved a resonant amplitude change of 0.6 dB with a 6 MHz frequency downshift in a duration of 10 seconds of 532 nm laser exposure. The laser operated at a power of 5 mW and was located at a distance of 30 cm above the target resonator. The proposed design is the first exploration of the integration of TNT membranes with a microwave resonator for pioneering new forms of optical sensors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotonic and Optical Devices→French-language works237,207→