Pengaruh Pola Asuh dan Lingkungan Masyarakat Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas V SDI Harekakae, Kabupaten Malaka
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aims to find out how much influence parenting patterns and the influence of the community environment have on the science learning outcomes of class V students at SDI Harekake, Malacca Regency. Data in the research were taken using questionnaires and tests. The questionnaire was divided into two groups, namely to reveal data on parenting patterns and the community environment. Test scores are used to reveal the science learning outcomes of fifth grade students at SDI Harekakae. The analysis technique used in hypothesis testing is a multiple linear analysis technique. The results of the research show that, there is no significant influence between parenting styles on the science learning outcomes of class V students at SDI Harekakae with a significance value of 0.1630 > 0.05. There is no significant influence between the community environment on the science learning outcomes of fifth grade students at SDI Harekakae. This is proven by the calculation results which show a significance value of 0.0826 > 0.05 and there is no significant influence between parenting style and the community environment on science learning outcomes. fifth grade student at SDI Harekakae. Because the significant value of parenting patterns and the community environment is greater than the Alpa Value.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".